The advent of decentralized finance (DeFi) has opened up a world of possibilities for cryptocurrency investors to earn interest on their holdings.
By decentralising traditional financial services, anyone can now lend funds to DeFi applications. Depositing digital assets, often into standard liquidity pools, can earn investors interest rates far above what is currently offered by global banks.
However, while high interest rates are offered as a potential upside, liquidity pools offer a sometimes unknown downside risk known as impermanent loss.
In this guide, we will explain exactly what impermanent loss is, provide an easy to follow example and outline the steps investors can implement to mitigate the risk.
Impermanent loss is a unique risk involved with providing liquidity to dual-asset pools in DeFi protocols. It is the difference in value between depositing 2 cryptocurrency assets within an Automated Market Maker-based liquidity pool or simply holding them in a cryptocurrency wallet.
Essentially, it occurs when depositing them into an automated market maker (AMM) and then withdrawing them at a later date results in a loss, compared to if you had just HODL'd and left them in your wallet. In fact, you may not actually lose any money, but rather your gains are less relative to if you had just left your assets untouched. Inversely, losses can be amplified depending on how the market moves.
The phrase earns its name because any losses are only accepted once the funds are withdrawn from the liquidity pool. Until then, any losses are only on paper and may reduce or disappear completely depending on how the market changes.
| Providing liquidity | Held in wallet | |
|---|---|---|
| Date 1 (Deposited) | Value of asset pair = $200 | Value of asset pair = $200 |
| Date 2 (Withdrawn) | Value of asset pair = $270 | Value of asset pair = $300 |
An extremely simplified example of impermanent loss. Assets have grown in value, but less than they would have compared to just holding.
To properly understand how impermanent loss occurs, you first need to understand how liquidity pools, which are used by AMM-style decentralized exchanges such as Uniswap, SushiSwap or PancakeSwap work.
A liquidity pool is typically made up of 2 cryptocurrencies known as a pair (e.g. ETH:DAI).
These are weighted equally in order to create a market for users to trade in and out of.
For example, an ETH:DAI pool is made up of 50% ETH and 50% DAI.
By prefunding a pool like this, AMMs avoid the need to pair buyers with sellers. Instead traders have access to a permanently available pool of liquidity rather than having to wait for someone on the other side of the trade, which is how traditional exchanges which use spot markets work.
AMMs calculate the exchange prices of standard liquidity pools. They raise and lower the value of cryptocurrency assets based on what assets are being purchased or sold by traders. The formula for each DEX can vary, but the most popular form is:
x*y = k
x is the amount of one cryptocurrency in the pool. y is the amount of the other and k is the total liquidity in the pool. When the total liquidity, k, changes, the ratio of x and y must adjust to remain balanced.
The total liquidity in a pool can change when trading fees are added, or when a liquidity provider adds or removes their liquidity.
When you provide liquidity to a pool, you deposit an equal value of each asset (e.g. $100 of ETH and $100 of DAI). You then receive liquidity provider tokens (LP tokens) which is a receipt that entitles you to a certain percentage of the pool, which is dynamic and corresponds to the amount of liquidity you provided compared to the overall amount in the pool.
So if you provided $200 of assets to a pool bringing the total up to $1,000, your LP tokens would entitle you to 20% of the pool when you go to use them to withdraw your assets again at a later date (which now includes trading fees or other rewards). But if other people add assets to the pool over time and bring the total up to $2,000, you would now only be entitled to 10% of the pool.
Unfortunately, though, there is a unique risk involved when providing 2 assets into a pool that requires the value of the assets to remain balanced.
For example, an ETH/LINK pool with a total value of $2 million would need $1 million of ETH and $1 million of LINK to remain balanced, regardless how many tokens that actually equates to.
As one (or both) of the tokens begins to fluctuate in value, the balance of the pool is going to shift. People are also trading in and out of the pool, which may also cause one side of the pool to grow or contract, ending up with something like a 60/40 balance.
When this happens, it presents an opportunity for arbitrage traders who essentially get to purchase one of the assets at a discount, compared to the rest of the market. By taking advantage of this, arbitrage traders end up naturally rebalancing in the pool. This is an important part of how AMMs stay operational, but creates a problem for liquidity providers.
Due to rebalancing, the number of tokens on either side of the pool has changed, even though the values have remained the same. Remember that LPs are entitled to a percentage of the pool, rather than a set amount of tokens or dollar equivalent. This means that when you withdraw from a pool, you may receive more of one token and less of the other.
Depending on how those assets changed in price, you may wind up with a "loss" compared to if you had just left those tokens in your wallet in the first place.
To understand the potential of impermanent loss, it is always best to go through an example with real numbers.
For this example, x = ETH, y = DAI, k = $10,000 (total liquidity) and r is 200 (1 ETH = 200 DAI). The new distribution of each asset can then be calculated using the following formulas:
At the new market price, this equals $282.82. Investor A has gained $82.82 compared to the initial investment. However, ...
In a volatile marketplace, impermanent loss is almost guaranteed when staking cryptocurrency assets within a standard liquidity pool. Exchange prices are always going to move. However, there are ways that the effects of impermanent loss can be mitigated.
In the above math example, no trading fees were added to the liquidity pool. Trading fees are collected from traders using the liquidity pool and a share of those fees are then rewarded to liquidity providers. These fees are sometimes enough to mitigate and offset any impermanent loss. The more trading fees collected, the less impermanent loss there will be. Past a certain point, if a pool collects enough fees an investor will have gained more from staking assets in a liquidity pool compared with holding them.
Impermanent loss is likely to occur for most volatile cryptocurrency pairings. However, impermanent loss can be mitigated by choosing a cryptocurrency pairing where the exchange price is not volatile. Examples of low volatility pairs include stablecoin pairings such as DAI:USDT, or different variations of the same token such as wETH(wrapped Ether):ETH. These examples include cryptocurrency pairings that follow a very similar price. Therefore, significant price movements between the pair are unlikely. If price volatility does not exist, impermanent loss can be avoided.
One of the main reasons for impermanent loss is due to the 50:50 split that is required by most liquidity pools. To overcome this issue, some decentralized exchanges such as Balancer offer users a variety of liquidity pool ratios. They also offer pools with more than 2 digital assets. Price changes in pools that have a higher ratio, such as 80:20 or 98:2, do not result in as much impermanent loss when compared with pools that have a 50:50 split.
Impermanent loss occurs in a standard liquidity pool where 2 different cryptocurrency assets must be deposited. However, some exchanges such as Bancor have developed liquidity pools that offer users the opportunity to stake only one side of the pool. The other side of each liquidity pool on Bancor is made up of the native Bancor token, BNT. For example, for all ETH that is provided to the ETH:BNT liquidity pool, the equivalent BNT is added by the system. As a user only has to provide one side of the liquidity pool, there is no risk of impermanent loss.
Bancor has also recently integrated price feeds via the decentralized oracle, Chainlink. By tying liquidity pools with a live market price, they can automatically adjust when significant price changes occur. This is not possible in standard liquidity pools.
While the basics of impermanent loss have been covered, there are a couple of extra details that are worth knowing before staking liquidity in DeFi protocols.
Impermanent loss can occur regardless of price direction. In the math example above, we increased the price of ETH and explained that impermanent loss meant gains were lessened in comparison to digital assets sitting in a wallet. However, impermanent loss occurs regardless of which asset in the cryptocurrency pair is moving. An investor can only withdraw digital assets that have not suffered an impermanent loss if the exchange price happens to be exactly the same at the time of withdrawal.
Secondly, an impermanent loss is only realised when funds are withdrawn. It is "impermanent" because prices could return to the initial exchange price at any time. If prices returned, the impermanent loss would no longer exist. The loss is only permanent if an investor withdraws their funds from the liquidity pool.
To help investors deal with the complexities of impermanent loss, there are now several calculators online that can help an investor determine the potential risks of depositing assets into specific liquidity pools. Below are a few options:
The incentives for liquidity providers in the DeFi sector are strong. However, they are strong for a reason. Each protocol needs to provide users comfort that they will not lose out to impermanent loss. While an impermanent loss is inevitable when staking liquidity in standard liquidity pools, there are alternatives that investors can use to mitigate the risk.
Those new to liquidity provision should stick with low volatile cryptocurrency pairings or stablecoin liquidity pools. Alternatively, investors can utilize some of the more complex liquidity pools to mitigate the impact. For the more advanced cryptocurrency user, yield farming techniques can be implemented to ensure returns always stay far ahead of impermanent losses.
Whether products shown are available to you is subject to individual provider sole approval and discretion in accordance with the eligibility criteria and T&Cs on the provider website.
Are you visiting from outside the US?
Where to get a holiday loan in 2024 and whether it makes sense for you.
Modak has no monthly fee, but it’s slim on features. Greenlight starts at $5.99 but is a value for big families.
Get the capital your business needs to grow with repayments that adapt to your revenue.
We’ve compared the best cash advance apps for quick cash — find the right one for your needs.
A review of Beyond Finance, a company that offers debt settlement and consolidation loans.
1. Make a budget 2. Create a savings plan 3. Automate savings 4. Pay yourself first 5. Use a high-yield account 6. Do a savings challenge…
To save $10K: 1. Automate savings 2. Invest 3. Budget 4. Open a high-yield savings account 5. Cut down on spending 6. Pay off debt…
A review of Arrowhead Advance, a tribal lender that charges interest rates up to 830% and has numerous bad reviews.
There aren’t many personal loans with no credit check. True no credit check loans include cash advance apps, payday loans and more.
Compare business cash advances from a variety of lenders and the pros and cons of each option.
